VIP-NC response to SCOTUS ruling on AZ citizenship requirements

The Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) ruled this morning that Arizona could not add requirements to the 1993 National Voter Registration Act (also called “Motor Voter”) that would force applicants to provide proof of citizenship when attempting to register with the federal voter registration form. Many voter integrity supporters will be shocked to note that Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion, with only Thomas and Alito dissenting. A detailed NY Times analysis can be found here.

Rather than get frustrated by the ruling, supporters of voter integrity should light up the phones of their Congressional delegation and ask how your elected Rep or Senator plans to remedy the problem. Federal law got us into this mess and it will take a change to that law in order to get us out of it.

Simply put, we urgently need a specific law allowing states to screen for US citizenship in their voter registration processes. Getting Congress to pass such a law would be easier than getting it through the cynical Senate side; but this question needs to be asked of our elected “leaders” right away.

Pragmatists will argue against such a measure, but any elected Legislator who opposes allowing states to keep non-US citizens off the voter roll . . . is unfit for office. Voters and activists need to ask the hard question to their “leaders” in order for the politicians to get the message. Otherwise, we deserve the government we have!

Did Thom Tillis really blame constitutional lawyers for his bad voter ID bill?

Tom Tillis’ wide-ranging interview by Don Curtis (owner of Curtis Media) was aired on May 12, 2013.

The questions about HB 589 begin around the 42:00 minute mark.

(VIP-NC commentary will follow the transcript). Read the rest of this entry »

Response to Wake Forest University Student Newspaper

(Raleigh, NC)—MAY 1, 2013— Besides voter ID, there is probably no election reform bill in the 2013 Legislature that poses a greater existential threat to Progressives than SB 667: a bill that would make college students vote like . . . well . . . adults; but it’s only hanging by a thread thanks to attacks from both informed liberals and pragmatic conservatives. Read the rest of this entry »

VIP-NC Response to Passage of HB 589 (“Voter ID” legislation)

The only excuse that Thom Tillis’ indirectly gave us about his stunningly weak “voter ID” law is that Eric Holder was making him do it. We hope the voters will keep that in mind if they should ever see Thom’s name on a ballot again. . . . Now, the battle moves on to the Senate, where we hope they will approach this with more of an investigative mindset and avoid any up-front concessions that there is no vote fraud in North Carolina.

-Jay DeLancy, Executive Director of VIP-NC

Is there really vote fraud in NC?

(Raleigh, NC)-APR 23, 2013-Lou Stannard was steaming mad and who could blame him? He had just finished up a gig as a volunteer Election Observer and was furious as he watched voter fraud, over and over, right before his eyes . . . and nobody could do anything about it, without breaking our state’s protective election laws.

At an historic April 10, 2013 Legislative public hearing on election law, Lou described how people entered the Precinct and couldn’t recall their addresses without reading from a freshly printed “voter ID card.” These so-called cards were actually full-sized pieces of paper that looked like freshly printed utility bills, which is adequate “voter ID” under our state’s current fraud-friendly election laws.

“To not know you were observing voter fraud at the time,” said Lou, “you would have to be a fool.”

If the Precinct Judges had cared to investigate, their only recourse would have been to demand proof of identity, but due to hideous Federal pressure, a fake utility bill is defined as valid ID. The Progressives have manipulated the laws in numerous states to facilitate that same type of fraud well into the future. Today, they are on the cusp of doing it in North Carolina, as well, in the name of “voter ID.”

Then there is the maddening testimony of Larry Henson. He observed at the polls long enough to notice the same woman voting for a second time, so he alerted the Chief Judge, who watched but did little else. When she attempted to vote a third time, Larry shamed the Judge into taking action. The Judge approached the woman and discovered that she was now claiming to be a male voter! When confronted, she got annoyed and shouted, “are you denying my neighbor’s right to vote?!Read the rest of this entry »

Older posts «